Quantcast
Channel: Teradata Forums - Database
Viewing all 14773 articles
Browse latest View live

Failure 3932 Only an ET or null statement is legal after a DDL Statement. - response (3) by ravimans

$
0
0

KVB,

I tried the same way where i am able to run successfully. Let me know how you executed?

 

 *** Logon successfully completed.

 

 *** Teradata Database Release is 14.10.04.03

 

 *** Teradata Database Version is 14.10.04.03

 

 *** Transaction Semantics are BTET.

 

 *** Session Character Set Name is 'ASCII'.

 

 

 

 *** Total elapsed time was 1 second.

 

 

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 *** Warning: EOF on INPUT stream.

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 

 

 

 

create table dbname.t

 

(

 

id integer

 

)

 

;

 

 

 

 *** Table has been created.

 

 *** Total elapsed time was 1 second.

 

 

 

 

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 

 

create table dbname.t1

 

(

 

column1 integer,

 

column2 varchar(10)

 

)

 

;

 

 

 

 *** Table has been created.

 

 *** Total elapsed time was 1 second.

 

 

 

 

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 

 

create table dbname.t2

 

(

 

column1 integer,

 

column2 varchar(10)

 

)

 

;

 

 

 

 *** Table has been created.

 

 *** Total elapsed time was 1 second.

 

 

 

 

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 

 

create table dbname.t3

 

(

 

column1 integer,

 

column2 varchar(10)

 

);

 

 

 

 *** Table has been created.

 

 *** Total elapsed time was 1 second.

 

 

 

 

 

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----

 

 

 

 *** Warning: EOF on INPUT stream.

 

 *** BTEQ exiting due to EOF on stdin.

 

 

 

 *** Exiting BTEQ...

 

 *** RC (return code) = 0


SET Vs MULTISET - response (2) by Fred

$
0
0

Some duplicate row checking must still be done even with a unique index, since SET table semantics call for duplicate rows to be quietly eliminated (no error thrown) in multi-row operations such as INSERT/SELECT. 
Checking is done against rows with the same RowHash. Having UPI means that usually there would be no more than one row to check, so the overhead is minimal. That's not true for USI.

New to Teradata from T-SQL - response (1) by shelleybobelly

$
0
0

Haha I found this blog to be very helpful. Looks like you kind of have to do it in a Teradata Macro (which is like a stored proc on TSQL). Your answer is about 3/4 down.  I'm in the same boat as you, only with about 17 years TSQL, so good luck to you!
 

http://sqlfool.com/mssql-dba-guide-to-teradata/

 

Access blocking for connection users - response (1) by nandalaanil

$
0
0

login to viewpoint as a admin user. then you can create filter for restricting perticular IP address 

Transpose from columns to rows - response (1) by dnoeth

$
0
0

You need nested aggregrations, e.g.

select
   count(case when typestring = 'FE' then 1 end) as count_FTET
  ,count(case when typestring = 'F'  then 1 end) as count_FT
  ,count(case when typestring = 'E'  then 1 end) as count_ET
  ,count(case when typestring = ''   then 1 end) as count_NULL
from
 (
   select  -- one row per customer with a concatenated list of types
      Cust_ID
     ,max(case when Type = 'FT' then 'F' else '' end) ||
      max(case when Type = 'ET' then 'E' else '' end) as typestring
   from vt
   group by 1
 ) as dt

 

How SYSDATE will work if load is going more than one day - response (4) by dnoeth

$
0
0

Hi Moutusi,
assuming SYSDATE indicates you're using MultiLoad or TPump:
SYSDATE & SYSTIME will be the same for all rows loaded, but this is clearly mentioned in the manuals, e.g.

&SYSDATE, &SYSDATE4, &SYSTIME, and &SYSDAY reflect the time when Teradata TPump begins execution.

CURRENT_DATE/TIME/TIMESTAMP will be the same within a request, TEMPORAL_DATE/TIME/TIMESTAMP within a transaction.

Removing a line break character in a column - response (1) by dnoeth

$
0
0

Hi Mark,
oReplace does not automatically replace line breaks, check with CHAR2HEXINT. 
 
 
But as you must remove both CR and LB you better use oTranslate(x, '0A0D'xc,'') instead.
 

Non duplicate row selection query - response (16) by dnoeth

$
0
0

Yuva's approach utllizing a hash function like SHA (but don't use HASHROW) should work.
You don't have to add it as a new column, simply calculate it on the fly concatenating all columns. The GROUP BY will use less spool than PARTITION BY:

qualify
   row_number() 
   over (partition by 
           hash_sha512(TRIM(PROCESS_DATA_MONTH) || '.' ||
                       TRIM(GEOGRAPHY_CODE) || '.' ||      
         ...
         order by DIRECT_ID) = 1

select * from CONSUMER_TABLE 
WHERE DIRCT_ID IN
  (select min(DIRECT_ID)
   from CONSUMER_TABLE
   GROUP BY hash_sha512(TRIM(PROCESS_DATA_MONTH) || '.' ||
                       TRIM(GEOGRAPHY_CODE) || '.' ||      
         ...)

There's an existing SHA-2 implementation, but it's not implemented for Unicode: http://forums.teradata.com/forum/extensibility/sha-2-udfs-for-teradata


DBC.Objectusage table is empty but ObjectUseCountCollectRate = 10 - response (6) by dnoeth

$
0
0

ON ALL will work, but do you really need it for each and every table in all databases and users?
E.g. staging tables are usually fully deleted and reloaded.

How to Skip first COLOUMN from a flatfile and load remaining columns using mload? - response (1) by dnoeth

$
0
0

Hi Amarnath,
simply define it as a FILLER instead of a FIELD in the LAYOUT.

DBC.Objectusage table is empty but ObjectUseCountCollectRate = 10 - response (7) by teradatauser2

$
0
0

There is another good post with details about usecount in case you need it -
http://developer.teradata.com/database/articles/identifying-used-unused-and-missing-statistics
-Thanks !
Samir

TARA BAM 1300: 3: System Detected Error - response (3) by teradatauser2

$
0
0

Hi,
I dont think there is a solution to this apart from restarting after lock is released. You dont have a "access lock" in archive.  The CT as.. would take a read lock on the source table which is restrictive in nature or you can try "locking source table for access" below Ct and try.
--Samir

5464 Error: A search condition must be deterministic error while creating a join index - forum topic by Tanmoy

$
0
0

Hi,
 
I am trying to create a join index on a table based on a date range.
 

create join index financial.idx_cust_present_ji

as

select cust_id, c_name, city,date_spent

from financial.cust_present_1

where cast(date_spent as date format 'yyyymmdd') > '20150101'; 

---where extract(year from date_spent) = 2015

;

Forums: 

On Commit Preserve Rows taking much time - response (3) by teradatauser2

$
0
0

You can use below query to check data distribution on every amp. You would notice that data will not be uniformly distributed, so it takes time to create this volatile table.

 

sel hashamp(hashbucket(hashrow(your PI column))) as #amp,count(*)

from your_table_name

group by 1

order by 2 desc;

 

--Samir

Best criteria for selecting NUPI - response (6) by teradatauser2

$
0
0

Hi Diether,
Is it not suggested to create a PI on the sequence id and a NUSI on - 

SEQID,DATA_SOURCE_ID,TIME_PERIOD,PROCESS_DATA_MONTH

.This will have a proper disstibution as well as Sec index for access. Of course the queries need to be tested if they use the SI or not and then decide ? Generally what is recomended practice in such situations.
Thanks !
Samir


Best criteria for selecting NUPI - response (7) by dnoeth

$
0
0

Hi Samir,
first check the FK columns (used for joins), then the columns used in Where, but defining a useless PI is the last resort. 
Every relational table should have a logical Primary Key constraint, simply adding a stupid sequence still doesn't mean there's a real PK and you'll encounter duplicate rows.
And based on John's other thread Non duplicate row selection query he tries to get rid of them :-)

Failure 3932 Only an ET or null statement is legal after a DDL Statement. - response (4) by KVB

$
0
0

I executed like MSR not separately.

Execute a set of DDL's as a single script - forum topic by KVB

$
0
0

Hi All,
 I have a set of DDL's where I need to execute them only all the syntaxes are correct else I dont need to execute any of the statement in the script.
I tried with MSR and came to know that it supports only DML.
What's the best approach that suits this requirement.
Any help in this regard is appreciable.
 
Regards
KVB

Forums: 

Backup - response (1) by teradatauser2

$
0
0

Hi ,
We had the same issue in our installation. But, we knew the reason for it. When the TD14 was upgraded, the BAR was still not upgraded and it was using a public network, so the speed was slow. After that TD GSC upgraded the BAR and moved it closer to the TD box and started using provate network, then our backups were fast, in fact faster than TD13.10. Pls check if that is a reason for you also.
--Samir

Using Case statement instead of Union - forum topic by sbadnikar

$
0
0

I have a table which has data like:

C1|C2|C3|C4

a|||

|b||

||c|

|d|e|

 

I want output like

 

C

---

a

b

c

d

e

I do not want to use union and tried using case statement.

CASE WHEN C1 IS NOT NULL THEN C1

WHEN C2 IS NOT NULL THEN C2

WHEN C3 IS NOT NULL THEN C3

WHEN C4 IS NOT NULL THEN C4

END

 

This gave me

 

C

---

a

b

c

d

 

I dont want to miss out on the value e in C3 column because C2 satisfied the condition first.
Please suggest a way to have all values in one column without using union.

Forums: 
Viewing all 14773 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>