Thanks all for the responses.
Vlad,
Yes the statment has a spello, it should read as " I did an explain plan on insert statmenets for a table defined as set and then altered it as multiset."
Raja,
The volume of data differes, I have around 60 tables to consider.
So all in all , I am going to look at the data volume I am expecting on each table. If table volume is not expected to be less even after long period, I am planning to keep them as set.
For larger tables (in count), I will have to check the trade off between keeping table as set and doing a group by on all fields after changing table to multiset. This is where I am stuck, because adddition of group by shows in plan with additional time and I am not able to check if that extra time is bad or good than the AMP level duplicate check for set table.
Abin.
Thanks all for the responses.
Vlad,
Yes the statment has a spello, it should read as " I did an explain plan on insert statmenets for a table defined as set and then altered it as multiset."
Raja,
The volume of data differes, I have around 60 tables to consider.
So all in all , I am going to look at the data volume I am expecting on each table. If table volume is not expected to be less even after long period, I am planning to keep them as set.
For larger tables (in count), I will have to check the trade off between keeping table as set and doing a group by on all fields after changing table to multiset. This is where I am stuck, because adddition of group by shows in plan with additional time and I am not able to check if that extra time is bad or good than the AMP level duplicate check for set table.
Abin.